Messianic Anthropology

The article explores the manifesto of Moscow Anthropological School, emphasizing primacy hallucinations in anthropogenesis. current predicament modern humanity urges anticipation something genuine and substantial. However, essence philosophy does not always align with prevailing “spirit times.” Its mission is to pursue autopoiesis, scrutinizing society for its inherent flaws that impede progress. From this viewpoint, F.I. Girenok’s hallucinatory theory entirely pertinent justified. narrative civilization typically portrayed as a chronicle discoveries triumphs rationality over irrationality. history fears misconceptions, which only persist from past but also resurface, less well-documented. Therefore, program School far being peripheral; on contrary, it holds significant relevance. It furthers tradition inversion anthropology, initially established by N.Ya. Danilevsky, first Russian critic Darwinism. This anthropological was particularly advanced concept B.F. Porshnev research contemporary authors like Yu.M. Boroday V.A. Podoroga. Each, their unique way, contributed critique evolutionism reductionism. evokes schizoanalysis, albeit devoid Marxist influence, unlike G. Deleuze. All these aspects warrant comprehensive philosophical discourse manifesto. Meanwhile, reports discussions concerning revealed all participants are readily prepared tread path suggested founder theory, confining themselves theological explorations instead. This, per author article, inherently signifies messianic anthropologies complementary each other.